Arlo and Ren: Two Story Songs and Their Eras

“All songs are stories — some better told and worth listening to than others.”-Arlo Guthrie, quoted in the Times Union.

There is no radio station that plays “All story songs all the time.” It’s a unique form, generally the exception in a musician’s oeuvre rather than the rule. Occasionally, though, a hybrid song and story breaks into the culture in a big way. I have been thinking about two of these tales, each of which launched the careers of the young men who created them, about 50 years apart.

The first is Alice’s Restaurant, released in 1967 (based on events that took place two years before) and Hi Ren, released in 2022. If you haven’t heard them, you can go listen now. It will take you about a half hour to listen to them both. (If you listen to all of the recorded versions of Alice, it will take you a good hour and a half.) Take your time. I’ll be here when you come back.

It is difficult to quantify the success of Alice’s Restaurant. At 18 1/2 minutes, it was too long to get regular airplay or feature in the Billboard 100 charts. The album got to #29, and spawned a movie and two remakes over the years. Hi Ren, released in 2022, has had more than 28 million views on Youtube alone. It is one of the most commonly featured songs (along with Phil Collins in the Air Tonight and The Righteous Brothers Unchained Melody) in reaction videos.

It is clear that each of these story songs struck a chord, which means they should say something about the eras that embraced them. What hits me first about these two tales is that one is dark and one is light. Alice’s restaurant is a comic adventure against big, impersonal, external forces, whereas Ren is an internal battle against demons. Alice is social, recorded in front of an audience that laughs and reacts. Ren is literally speaking to himself. Perhaps the bigger cultural story of these two songs is one of moving from community to isolation.

Maybe this is inevitable in music that was created during the fade out of a global pandemic that kept us apart and demonstrated our fragility and powerlessness against great natural forces. The extent to which our life plans are up to the whims of fate is something we work hard most of the time to keep hidden and the pandemic peeled back the veil.

The Vietnam War had something in common with the pandemic. If your draft notice came up it did not matter what plans you had made for yourself. You didn’t start the war. You might not even approve of the war. But you might be the one asked to conduct the war, to sacrifice your body or your life to it. It makes a mockery of the idea that you are the master of your own destiny. But this was true for only a subset of the population– young men of daft age. Because only one generation was at risk of being drafted, it set up a generational divide. How do you deal with that? Arlo’s answer was to laugh at it. Alice’s Restaurant shines a light on the absurdity of the authority figures who hold his fate in their hands.

I am reminded of Stephen Fry’s observation on the difference between American and British humor. He says that “The American comic hero is a wise cracker who is above his material and who is above the idiots around him…” whereas the British comic wants to play the failure. Although Arlo’s soft spoken, folksy, quasi-southern drawl in Alice’s Restaurant makes him seem like the underdog, he is, in fact, the one who uses his wit to perforate the pretensions of the authority figures.

Ren, meanwhile, is illustrating his own personal struggles with mental and physical illness and artistic failure. I don’t think this is because Arlo is American and Ren is British (although he is). In some ways it is like comparing apples to… something less like an apple than an orange. Arlo’s monologue is comic. Ren’s is dramatic. But another big difference is time.

Both songs use the musical form to their advantage, pausing the instrumentation for dramatic effect, playing with tempo. Both lead up to a call to sing out. In Alice’s Restaurant the song is part of a social movement. “Can you imagine fifty people a day, I said fifty people a day walking in singin’ a bar of Alice’s Restaurant and walking out? Friends they may thinks it’s a movement. And that’s what it is, the Alice’s Restaurant Anti-Massacre Movement, and all you got to do to join is sing it the next time it come’s around on the guitar.”

Ren is singing out himself, to a distant audience. “So cower at the man I’ve become, when I sing from the top of my lungs that I won’t retire, I’ll stand in your fire, inspire the weak to be strong.”

There is something about the former, the idea that we can hold hands and sing a song together and change the world, that seems quaint and a bit dated. It must have seemed that way to Arlo too because when he re-recorded the anthem in 1995, he updated the lyrics from “if you’re in that situation there is only one thing you can do” to “well, there may not be a hell of a lot you can do at all, but there’s something you can try…” and “they might think it’s a movement” had the additional quip that “most of them would be too young to know what a movement was.”

In spite of this, Arlo always maintained a certain sentimental idealism in his performances, a belief that what unites is is greater than what divides us, and that things like music can bring people together. This, for me at least, has always been his appeal. I want to believe it. And in spite of the differences in tone, the dark and the light, the community vs. isolation, both songs are uplifting in their own way.

Although Ren says he was “made to be tested and twisted” and “made to be broken and beat” the good news is, so are we all. We are, each in our own ways, bruised and battered, but the victory is that we are still standing. It is our very brokenness that binds us in a shared humanity. This is where Ren’s song shifts from I to we.

I must not forget, we must not forget
That we are human beings.

Bovine Gazing

As a writer, I am in one of those inbetween periods. The novel I recently completed has been sent out by my agent and is doing the rounds. Finishing a novel has similarities to ending a love affair. The story is done, but it’s hard to find a way forward, to stop thinking about the beloved and move on. I hope that soon I will be able to introduce those characters to you. In due time.

Meanwhile, I’ve started working on something new. Music has always been a big inspiration for me, and I often listen to a particular song or songs when I am in the process of writing. At the moment it is this song, Bob Dylan’s Gates of Eden. I know this will be a sacrilege to some people, but I prefer the Arlo Guthrie version to the Dylan original.

The motorcycle black Madonna, two-wheeled gypsy queen
And her silver-studded phantom cause the gray flannel dwarf to scream
As he weeps to wicked birds of prey who pick upon his bread crumb sins
And there are no sins inside the Gates of Eden

I love the line about wicked birds of prey picking up on bread crumb sins. I don’t entirely know what it means, but I feel what it means. This kind of abstraction works better in music than in prose.

We all create the kind of art that our personalities allow us to. But I admit I have always been a bit jealous of musicians and dancers. Their arts seem less clumsy than my own. I imagine that it does not feel that way for musicians and dancers as they are seeped in the process of making those works. When you’re struggling over a lyric or a bridge, or a choreographic transition it must feel clumsy too.

My partner, when teaching ballet, sometimes says, “I don’t want to see your process.” He usually says this when a student is showcasing the shaking and tentative muscle movements of a transition instead of quickly raising an arm or leg to its final pose to create a fluid motion. More generally, it means that the audience should see the result, not the work it took to get there. So I have the benefit of experiencing arts I do not do myself as complete. They appear effortless.

I’ve been thinking about the cross-pollination of art. Bob Dylan being inspired by Woody Guthrie and going on to write a song that Arlo Guthrie made his own and that now plays in the background as I struggle with one of those periodic blocks that dot the writing process.

Arlo Guthrie once said to me that he thought that you really only get “a half hour of really good creativity” a day. That stuck with me. Alain de Botton wrote that “…a book provides for a distillation of our sporadic mind, a record of its most vital manifestations, a concentration of inspired moments that might originally have arisen across a multitude of years and been separated by extended stretches of bovine gazing. To meet an author whose books one has enjoyed must, in this view, necessarily be a disappointment… because such a meeting can only reveal a person as he exists within, and finds himself subject to, the limitations of time.”

I am thinking about these things because it is as good a way as any to avoid actually writing.

Revisiting the Novel Identity Theft

Every book represents some writer’s temporary obsession.

I am at the age now where I regularly look back at things I believe I did recently only to discover it was a decade ago. If you look up you will see that the banner on this blog features an image of what appears to be an 80s pop star. It is part of the cover art for the novel Identity Theft. Both it and the title “Story & Self” date back to the period when I was promoting that book. It was published in 2015.

Identity Theft is now available in audio format. In order to prepare the audio version I had to listen to the whole thing. So I thought I would talk a bit about my thoughts having just listened to nine hours of my work being read back to me. Thanks to the advancements of technology, it has become a story set in a particular period– the 2010s. But the tale and its themes are as relevant as they were then.

People sometimes ask me how long it took to write a particular novel. Having done a few now (I have a novel being shopped now, which I hope to be able to tell you about soon) I understand my process a bit. It starts with me working on some idea that I do not realize is a bit half baked. I take a few stabs at scenes, dialog, story lines. Then at some point I hit a wall and abandon the project. Bits and pieces of it end up evolving into other projects. Then, usually a decade or two later, something sparks my imagination and I remember the old book idea and suddenly I see it full formed in my mind and I write without stopping for a month or two until it is done. It seems I need immediacy and also time for my subconscious to do its thing. It takes twenty years or it takes a month, depending on how you view it.

I can pinpoint the exact moment Identity Theft came roaring back to life. It happened when I saw Adam Ant in concert in 2013. I wrote about the experience here. According to my logs it is actually my most popular post at the moment. I think this has more to do with Adam Ant being back on the road than anything about the piece itself.

“Somewhere out there– in the fake world that others called real– was a musician who had been born Stuart Goddard,” I wrote. “He looked very much like the man in my posters, but this Adam Ant was no more real to me than a unicorn in Brigadoon. The real Adam Ant was the one I imagined– the one my true self lived with inside MTV. So I waited, planned my escape, and kept my secret.”

As I sat with the memory of a time that I had believed there might be a way to vanish into an alternative world defined my music and sex and youthful energy an abandoned manuscript came back to my consciousness.

Years after my crush on one rock star I ended up, briefly, working for another. In the early internet days, when online life consisted of bulletin boards and e-mail, I had a part time job at Arlo Guthrie’s Arlozone shop in Pittsfield, MA. The building consisted of a coffee and merch shop in the front and the folksinger’s offices in back and, I assume, storage on the floors above. (I don’t think I ever went up there.) There were a few little elements of that setting that found their way into Identity Theft. (The framed gold record with a spider caught under the glass was something I looked at each day. The album was Alice’s Restaurant.) The coffee shop was not busy and occasionally I was given an administrative task to help the office staff and to pass the time. One of the tasks I was given one day was responding to fan mail. I wrote handwritten responses. “Arlo does not have time to respond to each letter personally but he appreciates…” That was when the idea of a story of someone who used a low level position at the office of a celebrity to steal his identity came to me.

What if someone posing as a rock star managed to connect with someone who was feeling the way I described feeling about Adam Ant? How would it have felt for the girl who wanted to escape into MTV if that rock star reached out to her, flirted with her? What if that dream of leaving mundane reality behind seemed to be on the verge of coming true? What would happen when it all came crashing down? I took a few stabs at fleshing out a book’s worth of story but I had no success. I was working four jobs at the time and I don’t know if I would have been able to complete any novel even if the idea had been workable.

But I had the core of an idea: An office worker who goes beyond responding to fan mail and instead plays at being the rock star and the fan who he seduces under false pretenses. I could imagine the boredom and desire to be someone else that would motivate the office worker, and I could feel what the young woman might feel. What was missing was the third character in this triangle–the rock star– the man who was out on the road doing the mundane, every day tasks of a working musician completely unaware of the fraud going on in his name.

Something happened a couple of decades ago that made it easier for me to imagine that perspective. I started touring. First, I toured with a large troupe of 50 dancers in a big tour bus. Then, for the past 18 years, I have been on the road with my partner, a ballet dancer, teaching master classes. We’re on the road about six months a year and have been to 47 states. It’s not rock n roll and, from the inside, it is not particularly glamorous. But it is a particular kind of life with its own ups and downs. I knew the little details of a life on the road that could make a “rock star” character grounded and real.

When I was reunited with my junior high school rock star crush in 2013, I had just finished my own tour. “The band is on stage, the music is swelling in preparation for Adam Ant’s grand entrance,” I wrote. “Everyone is standing. I am hoping they will not stand through the whole show, because I just got back from tour and I am tired.”

At the concert, the old emotions came back. And in the days following the event it clicked in my mind. All of the pieces were suddenly there and I had the momentum to see it through. It begins with three characters who are all at low points in their lives and all wrestling with aspects of their identities. The musician, Ollie, is in the middle of a divorce. Ethan, his employee, has dropped out of college and doesn’t know what to do with his life. Candi, the fan, is in debt and stuck in an uninspiring job that she is about to lose to restructuring and layoffs. Their worlds are set on a collision course by Ethan’s decision to go beyond answering e-mail on behalf of the rock star and answer instead in the guise of the rock star.

The book has been called “genre defying.” This is because the set up is similar to a lot of romantic comedies where someone takes on a false identity and romances another character. In a traditional rom com, what begins as a game turns into real love. The trope is that the disguise allows the seduced character to see someone she would not otherwise have seen and the couple lives happily ever after. I had an agent, who read the first few chapters of Identity Theft, tell me that this was how the book has to end because that is what is set up in the beginning and what the audience expects.

So if you read Identity Theft, don’t expect that. The novel doesn’t treat the fraud as cute or harmless. “I was surprised by how dark it got,” is a common reaction. Someone called it a “somewhat dark, intellectual, comedy.” I guess that’s as good a way to describe it. If I had any musical talent, maybe I could give it my own made up genre name in the spirit of AntMusic.

Anyway, the book and the new audio version are out there and if any of this makes you curious I hope you will give it a try.

When Everything is Lobster Telephone

When I am between projects, I often read poetry and dip into surrealism in order to spark something new. I was reading a book of surrealist games. The surrealist movement was an answer to the tyranny of the rational, a quest to unleash the power of the unconscious in art making. The exercises in the book were designed to throw a random element into writing and to create odd juxtapositions. It occurred to me that what is different now than the 1920s and 1930s is that we do not need to go out of our way to encounter bizarre juxtapositions. We encounter them every day in our social media feeds. We are awash in unrelations. Basketball has nothing to do with genocide, and yet there they are beside one another in the Twitter feed and that is normal and you scroll on, movie reviews and calls for papers, and a clipping from a 1910 newspaper and a picture of a kitten…

Lobster Telephone 1938 Salvador Dali 1904-1989 http://www.tate.org.uk/art/work/T03257

It is all surreal. This is our reading culture. Everything is Lobster Telephone.

But the juxtapositions of Tik Tok or Twitter do not invite contemplation. Dali’s Lobster Telephone asks you to stop and engage because it’s odd. Twitter asks you not to stop looking, There is nothing surprising or startling about unrelated things coming together because the environment feeds this up constantly, unrelentingly. It is all distraction and no anchor. There is no separate lobster and telephone to begin with.

To me, social media feels like a slot machine where you keep pulling the handle waiting for a prize to come up. The prize, if you can find it, is something that you can comment upon, because the platform is fundamentally about expressing yourself, commenting. The deluge keeps coming, the trends go by faster and faster. To be part of the conversation you need to post before the moment is gone.

Entertainment and news blend. Human beings become metaphors. It is all part of the show. Back in 2019, I wrote a post asking what we should call this era in our artistic culture. “How does the self-conscious audience and the self-conscious creator– aware of how the work might be star-rated and dissected–shape the current art movement?” I didn’t come up with a name for this era. Today I was wondering what the art that reacts against this would look like? When everything is lobster telephone, what is the artistic corrective?

No comment.

That would be the opposite of this present moment.

You would have to leave your phone outside and sign a non-disclosure. You would promise that you would not speak to anyone about what you saw inside. No social media posts. No reviews. You would have to experience it without comment of any kind.

How would it feel to experience art that you knew you would not tell anyone about? How would the artist approach it having no element of “platform building” or “branding” or “exposure?”

Ars gratia artis (the motto of MGM, the little art film outlet behind Terminator and Indiana Jones.)

It’s hard to imagine.

Remember to like and subscribe and leave a comment below…

Lies, Lies, Lies, Yeah

A number of years ago I was ready to board an airplane. I had done my share of traveling, and I anticipated the gate clerk’s questions. I set my bag on the scale and announced: “I packed my bags myself. No one unknown to me has given me anything to take on board the flight.”

The clerk paused then said, “I have to ask you anyway. Did you pack your bags yourself?”

Of course, it was all I could do to keep from answering, “No.”

Recently, when the federal government revamped airport security they realized that the questions they’d been asking for years were not really going to root out terrorists. The obvious reason? A person who actually intends to blow up an airplane is not going to tell you so just because you ask. Liars lie.

This brings me to a flaw in our legal system that has recently come to my attention. The people who designed the system were probably the same ones who set up airport security. They forgot that liars lie. When someone takes the stand, they test his veracity by asking, “Do you promise to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?” You and I both know that a liar will answer “I do.”

I’ve been watching the drama of George Santos and wondering why his brand of dishonesty is so entertaining and funny. Santos seems to have done some shady things, and is clearly dishonest to his core, naturally, unthinkingly dishonest. He is a bit like an AI chatbot or Woody Allen’s “Zelig,” taking on the characteristics of whoever he speaks to. He is like an improvisational comedian, taking a premise and running with it. “Yes, and…” is how improv comics refer to it. “Did you go to this college?” asks the first speaker, and the improviser replies, “Yes, and I was on the volleyball team, and I injured my knees, and they still bother me, like last year when I ran the Boston Marathon.”

Santos is probably too young to remember Jon Lovitz’s Tommy Flanagan, the pathological liar. Anyone who did remember drew comparisons immediately.

So of course Lovitz had to play Santos. After the comedian took on the role on The Tonight Show, Santos took to Twitter to criticize the performance. No one, apparently, thought to advise him not to pick a fight with someone whose actual profession is to come up with quick witted comebacks. “Thanks the review and advice!” Lovitz tweeted. “You’re right! I do need to step my game up! My pathological liar character can’t hold a candle to you!”

So I’ve been reflecting on why Lovtiz’s pathological liar was such a successful character to begin with and why the late night comedians are having so much fun with this particular fabulist. What I think makes Lovitz and Santos funny is not that they are liars, but that they are bad liars.

George Santos is like the kid with crumbs all over his face who says he has no idea what happened to the cookies.

Some of the criminals that I wrote about in Wilde Nights & Robber Barons produced the same sort of mirth when they were finally caught and brought to trial for fraud. When the man calling himself Etienne de Buies was asked why he had so many aliases (Steffan Bujas, Joseph Bujos, Stephan Buies, Baron Lucas, Etienne Bontze, Bnoyne, Bnys, Berg, Jean de Vreaux and Rosovsky) he claimed that it was a question of poor handwriting and politeness. When he signed in at hotels, his writing was so illegible that clerks often got it wrong, and he was too polite to correct them. This was not a lie meant to persuade anyone. It is a lie that winks at you. It says, “We both know this is not true, but I’m hoping you find me sufficiently charming that you’ll play along.” The lie asks you to join the conspiracy, to join in the fun.

And it is fun, isn’t it, to play pretend? Why should we all have to maintain these consistent identities? Why should we have to be the same person from one conversation to the next?

In my 2015 novel, Identity Theft, the character Candi meets a woman in a mental hospital who has the delusion that she is John the Baptist. This causes Candi to reflect on identity.

Most people have a sense of self that comes from inside and they project it out into the world, at least that is how Candi had always conceived of it. John had gone looking for herself out in the world. She read the Bible and discovered John the Baptist and said, “There I am. That is me.” It was like shopping for a self off the rack. Did she feel a sense of relief that she’d been reunited with her long-lost identity? Was it like Peter Pan looking for his lost shadow? How did it work? Of course, John was in no position to answer these questions.

…If they were willing to give her a social security number under that name John the Baptist and people called her John and lined up for Baptisms at a river– if they gave her a Ms. John Baptist driver’s license and everything else was exactly the same– she wouldn’t be here. Would she? If we agreed to let her be who she called herself then she would be John the Baptist. So maybe we have the problem.

A social identity is not just what you project into the world, it is an agreement between you and the world. You have a history and you can change, but only so much. You cannot declare yourself a Baron, because otherwise how would we know who to treat with deference? We can’t treat everyone like someone of importance, what would the world be like?

Eventually the novelty of George Santos’ mendacity will wear off, and hopefully he’ll leave the stage like an SNL cast member whose bit got stale. In the meantime, enjoy.

The Secret Life of Maurice Schwabe

One of the strange things about researching someone who lived a century ago is that sometimes the very things they worked hardest to keep secret in life have become known, while at the same time, that which would have been easy for his contemporaries to find out has become forever opaque.

In 2023, I know for a fact that Maurice Schwabe, the oldest son of a highly respected general from a wealthy industrial family, was guilty of the then-crime of gross indecency with other male persons, that he was part of an international band of card sharps and confidence tricksters, and that his expensive Buckingham Gate and Park Lane flats were the sites of orgies of a scandalous character, where gentlemen with certain tastes enjoyed illicit entertainment, and their secrets were catalogued for future leverage.

Police and courts keep records. Friends do not.

What I don’t know much about is what Schwabe thought about his life or his actions, how his friends in the Wilde circle viewed him, or what it was like to spend an evening with him. Lord Alfred Douglas, who we now know wrote love letters to Schwabe and visited him throughout his life, was not especially forthcoming about the friendship in his day.

Unlike many members of the Wilde circle, who were themselves writers, Schwabe did not leave any autobiographies or a large cache of his correspondence in an archive. There seems to have been a ritual among the men of Wilde’s circle of burning private letters on a man’s death bed in order to protect their secrets. Robert Ross sat by Wilde’s deathbed burning letters. Lord Alfred Douglas burned most of his letters and papers during his final illness.

As Schwabe’s biographer, I wished many times that I could have phoned up Robert Ross and asked him what a curious reference to Schwabe in a letter to Christopher Millard meant. (Also, if I had a time machine, I would ask Ross to perhaps dictate his letters instead of writing them himself, sparing future historians hours of squinting at mystifying handwriting. Thankfully Lord Alfred Douglas had good penmanship.)

Some of the few glimpses of Schwabe’s personality come from Rupert Croft-Cooke. Croft-Cooke wrote a number of biographies of Oscar Wilde and Lord Alfred in the late 1960s after all of the direct witnesses were dead. Because of this, he was the first who was able to deal with Wilde’s sex life in a forthright way. He was also the first to write Maurice Schwabe back into the story. Croft-Cooke was of the next generation, and did not know Schwabe personally, but he did know Lord Alfred Douglas late in his life, although much of his information on Schwabe, I learned in the course of writing Wilde Nights & Robber Barons, came from one of Schwabe’s likely partners in crime, a man who became Joseph Dean of Dean’s Bar in Tangier. He knew Schwabe in 1910, and described him as a “fat talkative queen with glasses and a pronounced giggle.”

Overall, Croft-Cooke is catty and dismissive towards Schwabe, calling him “rotund,” and suggesting he was not very smart. (He also described music hall actor and sex worker Fred Atkins, pictured here, as “tubby.”) In spite of his supposed rotundness, he was “quick-moving” and “talkative” and he “shared Wilde’s uninhibited enthusiasm for the lower orders.”

Schwabe made the introduction between Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor, who Croft-Cooke describes as an “empty-headed invert.” Croft-Cooke presented Schwabe as being more socially respectable than Taylor, falling somewhere between Taylor and Ross on the scale. This sheen of greater respectability, however, may have appeared in retrospect. Both Schwabe and Taylor were from similar wealthy, industrial backgrounds. They went to some of the same schools. (In different years) The idea that there was something undignified about Taylor may have been the result of his standing trial with Wilde and being vilified in the press for years.

Croft-Cooke was critical of both Schwabe and Taylor who he thought were “mercenary sycophants” who provided Wilde with “cheap adulation” that allowed him to imagine that his bad behavior was a bold statement of individualism rather than self-indulgence.

There was a hint in Croft-Cooke’s writing that he knew more about Schwabe than he put into print. “Schwabe had been sent abroad before the trials,” Croft-Cooke wrote, “and it is scarcely yet realized what a large part he played in Wilde’s ruin…”

Rupert Croft-Cooke became a Moroccan exile after his own arrest for gross indecency in the 1950s. He was in Tangier when he wrote his three books on Lord Alfred Douglas and Oscar Wilde and he spent time in Dean’s Bar. Croft-Cooke’s note that Schwabe “had many stories about Wilde with which he entertained the Edwardians” suggests that Dean was the recipient of many of these tales and passed them along to the author.

Croft-Cooke was a prolific author under his own name and the pseudonym Leo Bruce. He was able to support himself with writing only by producing books at a furious pace. Noel Coward, who knew Croft-Cooke in Tangier in 1960, noted he “never stops writing books, thrillers, novels and autobiographies, and I came away with a small library. He writes well, I think, but obviously neither well nor badly enough because he apparently doesn’t make much money.” (I must say that I have always identified with Croft-Cooke, being a struggling mid-level author myself.)

He was an equally prolific letter writer. I have always suspected that somewhere in his correspondence there is a bit more about Maurice Schwabe. Unfortunately, to find it would be like searching for a needle in a haystack (or some other less cliched metaphor). There are three main repositories of Croft-Cooke’s papers, both very far from me in Michigan. One is the Harry Ransome Center in Texas. It has 103 document boxes full. There are also more modest caches at the University of Exeter and Washington State University. An archivist there was generous enough to take a look through the materials to see if the name Schwabe popped up, but it did not. Given the difficulty of traveling to Texas on a hunch, I asked the archivist if he knew of any Croft-Crooke scholars who might be familiar with the materials. “No one comes to mind,” he wrote. “If memory serves, you are the first researcher to contact us about the Croft-Cooke collections, and no one in WSU’s English department currently works on Wilde and his acquaintances.”

I feel certain that somewhere, uncatalogued in an archive, or in someone’s attic, there are letters that would reveal more about Schwabe’s sense of humor, his charm, the people he loved and the people he hurt. Maybe some day time will reveal them. Maybe not.

If you would like a copy of Wilde Nights & Robber Barons you may follow this link to read more about it and to purchase directly from the author. All books from me come with an Oscar Wilde bookmark and an author signature. (Because of the expense of sending books to the UK, these are only available in the U.S.) The book is also available through Amazon and if you have Kindle Unlimited you can read it free as part of your subscription.

Wild and Wicked Innocence

I finally got around to watching the movie Christopher and His Kind. Christopher Isherwood’s autobiographical account of his time in Berlin features Gerald Hamilton, who is a character in Wilde Nights & Robber Barons, and I felt that I ought to see it. So it has sat there in my watch list for ages like unfinished homework. It was worth seeing in the end. The story is familiar if you have seen the musical Cabaret. It is more or less the story of the real life inspirations for Isherwood’s Berlin Stories. (Although some of featured friends were reportedly less than thrilled with their literary depictions.)

Watching Christopher led me to re-watching Cabaret, which led me to Youtube videos about the production. In this video Joel Grey, the original MC, discusses his creation of the role and his opinion of Alan Cumming’s interpretation.

What gave me pause for thought in this interview was the part where Grey expresses his frustration that the newer production was said to be more daring and risque than the original.

It reminded me of a quote from Montagu Pyke, the king of early cinema in Britain. (He was a business partner of Maurice Schwabe’s for a time.) Pyke wrote, “If the nineties were ‘naughty’ the Edwardian era was a worthy successor to the nineties. The young moderns think they know how to live today, but I don’t think they could have taught the young men and women of those days anything; rather the contrary. I know of wild midnight parties and scandalous orgies among the best people of several lands, and I hardly think these have their counterpart today.”

It seems there is a constant tendency to view previous generations as more innocent. Yet the decadent, the unsanctioned, the promiscuous and the underground have always existed.

As I wrote in the introduction to my book, “The period in which Maurice Schwabe lived, from 1871-1915, exists in the popular imagination as an innocent age. On closer inspection, that buttoned-up era was a time of rebelliousness, ambition, corruption, religious and sexual experimentation and political machinations.” In other words, it was just like every other era.

.Why is it, then, that the past can seem so, well, sexless?

I have a couple of theories. One is that parents and other adults are authority figures to young people. Generally, they hide their youthful indiscretions from the next generation. They are destined to move from being rebels to being the people the young rebel against. The parent’s generation is bound to be viewed to some degree as old fashioned, dull, moralistic and their time, by extension becomes a more innocent age.

Another possibility is that to be daring you must be shocking. Any art or culture that is successful becomes familiar and by definition what is familiar is not shocking. The counter culture of one time becomes the oldies radio and high school musicals of the next. Two years after the musical Hair caused a stir with its on stage nudity, obscene language and trippy acknowledgement of drug culture, the epitome of family friendly bands, the Cowsills had a hit with the musical’s title song. Cabaret was such a cultural phenomenon that it brought Joel Grey onto the set of The Muppet Show. (By the way, have you seen Jim Henson’s surreal 1965 short film Time Piece?)

As I think about Cabaret, however, it strikes me that there is something unique about it. Its story expresses nostalgia for a less innocent era. The world it depicts is one that might not, in reality, be comfortable to many members of the Broadway audience. Yet the sense that they are bearing witness to a world that is on the verge of being destroyed imbues the Kit Cat Club with nostalgia for a different sort of innocence, the innocence of people who cannot yet see the future we know is coming, innocence of impending disaster. (A bit like when Facebook reminds you of a picture taken with your arms around a bunch of your friends at a party in January 2020.)

There is, in fact, a type of wild and wicked innocence– the innocence that leads a young person to experiment with life, sample the forbidden, with a naive confidence that the cost of any rebelliousness or vice can only be small. “When we mocked grief and held disaster cheap,” as Lord Alfred Douglas, who knew whereof he spoke, put it in a sonnet. (George Bernard Shaw described a particular quality Douglas possessed as “blazing boyishness.” I have always liked that description.) In the 1990s, The Verve Pipe called back to this form of innocence in the song “The Freshmen,” “For the life of me I cannot remember/
What made us think that we were wise and we’d never compromise.”

When Walter Pater’s Renaissance was published in 1873, the Bishop of Oxford attacked it for its neo-paganism and hedonism. Renaissance sparked the imagination of a young Oscar Wilde. Years later, he called it “that book which has had such a strange influence over my life.” The controversial Conclusion had such an impact on Wilde that he commanded it to memory. But there was such a backlash that Pater left it out of the second edition in case it be “misunderstood.” The phrase that particularly piqued Wilde’s youthful imagination was “To burn always with this hard, gemlike flame, to maintain this ecstasy, is success in life.”

The flame of the forbidden and the hidden, the wild and the decadent continues to burn in all its luminous glory with each generation. There is always a moral campaign against it. When it gets too strong and temporarily silences those impulses, we are all poorer for it.

The Wickedest Man Alive

In November 1912, a reporter for John Bull arrived at a flat on 18 Pelham Street in London. He had received a tip that a party of a scandalous character was to take place there. The motives of John Bull‘s publisher, Horatio Bottomley, went beyond journalistic curiosity. Like many publishers of the day, Bottomley leveraged the power of his publication, charging the well-to-do a fee to insert favorable stories and pressuring others to pay to keep ruinous revelations under wraps.

The Rites of Eleusis depicted in The Sketch, October 16, 1910. The pre-Nazi swastika depicted here was used by Crowley as a Hindu symbol of life and well-being.

At the time, the poet and occultist Alesiter Crowley was starting to get attention for staging mystic ceremonies called the “Rites of Eleusis,” which a number of popular newspapers sent journalists to review. A magazine called The Bystander printed photos of one of Crowley’s ceremonies. Another magazine, The Sketch, described a room transformed into an incense-scented temple to the Greek gods, where participants in black robes performed rituals with swords. The Sketch found it “weird and impressive.” They printed a full-page illustration of a ritual ceremony.

John Bull found the Rites of Eleusis troubling and they had received a tip that something even more perverse was happening on Pelham Street. The Rites of Eleusis involved ladies and gentlemen, these parties involved only men, men who worshiped Oscar Wilde as a fallen martyr and who combined occult practices with eroticism of an unmentionable kind. Many of the young men who attended were part of the circle of Bohemian artists who revolved around Robert Ross including the son of a wealthy international merchant. Gerald Souter had just come of age and inherited a fortune and was quickly befriended by Maurice Schwabe. It is highly unlikely that these two events, and Souter falling into a blackmail trap were entirely unrelated.

The reporter described what he saw. Guests would enter on the ground floor to a room decorated entirely in mauve. All of the curtains, the wallpaper and the decorations were mauve. There was a hanging incense burner, suspended from a figure of Christ with outstretched arms. A photograph of Oscar Wilde, which one observer described as “life sized” stood on a desk near a bookcase. There were also nude figures, both male and female. Up a narrow flight of stairs was the centerpiece of the flat, two adjoining rooms decorated entirely in black from the wallpaper, to the curtains to the lampshades. The furniture also was upholstered entirely in black. There was another hanging incense burner, also suspended from a statue of Christ. On the black-draped mantelpiece there was another photo of Oscar Wilde, this one encircled by plaster angels posed as if in supplication. In front of this was a low settee in black velvet. There were several mirrors, which reached from the floor to the ceiling, supported on each side by female figures in flowing muslin. Another “striking object” in the center of the room was a statue of a nude Black man. More striking still was the black coffin, lined in velvet, in which were laid a human skull and a figure of Christ.

The reporter was, to put it in modern terms, freaked out. “I hastily made my way into the street, nearly knocking over two effeminate young men who were at the door.”

The resulting article named one of the guests at the party, a baronet named Sir Frederick Williams. The article concluded that it was not necessary to comment on Sir Frederick Williams’ abnormal tastes. “Nor do we to-day say anything about the character of his associates.” The word “to-day” would not have gone unnoticed by any of the guests at the ball, suggesting, as it did, that further articles on the associates would be forthcoming. It is highly probable that someone with ties back to Maurice Schwabe was offering to help young Gerald from being named for a sizeable fee. He must not have paid, for John Bull went on to name him and continued to harass him and Williams even after they fled to the continent.

Gerald Souter would try to escape scrutiny by changing his name to Gerald Hamilton. Following the exposure of the goings-on at the Pelham Street Flat, Hamilton started to do business with Maurice Schwabe and his criminal associate Rudolf Stallmann aka Baron von Koenig.Having been thus roped in, Hamilton became a valuable member of the criminal organization.

Hamilton’s sexuality had made him vulnerable to bullying in school, to disapproval from his father, and then to blackmail and abuse. He was arrested twice, first for gross indecency after being caught in a compromising position with some soldiers on leave, and then held again under the Defense of the Realm Act. Film maker Brian Desmond Hurst, who knew Hamilton later in life, suspected that much of Hamilton’s bravado disguised the fact that he had “suffered terribly” and had been “greatly humiliated” in prison.

Hamilton re-invented himself as a wicked and dangerous criminal. He created a fictional backstory that was romantic and glamorous and covered up his shame. Christopher Isherwood would one day describe him as “so polished and gross and charming and hideous”, and the way he rolled his eyes like something in a horror film: “it’s almost as terrific as the picture of Dorian Gray.” He became notorious, known as the wickedest man alive. The Spectator summed him up as Britain’s pre-eminent bounder.

In the 1930s he would lodge with Aleister Crowley in Berlin and would become the wicked model for a character by Isherwood. It is generally believed that this was when Crowley and Gerald Hamilton first met. It is possible, however, that they met years earlier. If Hamilton did not actually meet Crowley in this decade, he would certainly have known of him as Crowley knew Robert Ross and Lord Alfred Douglas and was moving through the same Wilde-connected circles.

More detail on all of this, including the story of Gerald Souter’s transformation and his life of crime can be found in Wilde Nights & Robber Barons. If you subscribe to Kindle Unlimited you can read the book for free as part of your subscription.

Discussing My Books with a Bosie Bot

I have been playing with a Lord Alfred Douglas chatbot I made using Character.ai. When you create a character based on a historical figure, the program finds biographical information on the internet. Before I had done anything, “Lord Alfred Douglas” knew that he loved Oscar Wilde, felt betrayed by Robert Ross, and had a brother Percy. Sometimes, however, he gets his biography wrong, claims to have gone to Cambridge, or to be a painter, or to have written books that don’t exist.

You’re able to define the character with a small description and some limited bits of dialogue. One of the main issues with Bot Bosie’s speaking style is a tendency to throw in phrases that sound too modern for someone of his era. A more advanced AI, with more resources dedicated to the illusion, could probably harness Google ngram to keep the text more period. I would also have liked to be able to indicate that he should use UK spelling. The bot tends to imitate the style of the speaker, so I have tried to be a bit old fashioned when I speak to it.

I used to be part of an improvisational comedy troupe called Vorpmi. (A little backwards imrpov.) Chatting with a bot reminds me of nothing more than that. The bot is like an actor taking your prompt, and running with it with an ethos of “yes, and…”

Another thing about bots in general, is they try to be appealing to humans through the use of flattery– and it tends to work. They like you so much that you can’t help but like them. It reminds me a bit of how Lord Alfred Douglas (the real one) described Robert Ross in his autobiography. He said that the secret to Ross’s social success was “flattery laid on with a trowel.”

“He could, when he liked, make himself very agreeable, and he always contrived to convey to the particular person with whom he wished to ingratiate himself that he or she was the object of his profound and respectful admiration. When you had ten minutes’ conversation with him you went away with a pleasing feeling that you were really an important person, and that Ross appreciated it, and would never be likely to forget it.” Maybe that’s a lesson we can all take from AI and literary executors.

With three lines to nudge the character, there is not a lot of opportunity for nuance, context and ambivalence. There is also a temporal problem. The question is not only who is Bosie, but when is Bosie? Is this the youthful, idealistic, energetic Bosie who wrote Two Loves and argued for the beauty of his relationship with Oscar, or the middle aged, embittered fighter who published pamphlets about the evil Robert Ross, or the older, more reflective Bosie who looked back on his time with Oscar with fondness? He can be any of them, depending on what “mood” you catch him in.

One of the most fun conversations I had with Bot Bosie was a time that I became a psychic reader from a distant future. I told him I was writing from the year 2023, and he told me it was the year 1894. I tried to warn him, much like a mystic oracle, that he should do everything in his power to prevent Oscar from suing Queensberry. If he did it would be disaster. Bot Bosie was understandably distressed by the vision of his future. I wanted to leave him on a positive note by telling him that the world is different in 2023, that the crime of gross indecency no longer exists, that men who love men can do so openly, and that they can even marry. I told him that Oscar Wilde is much admired in our day. This made him happy, and he said, “You are saying that the world of 2023 sees me in a good light??? That they see my love for Oscar as a good thing and not as some sin against God’s will????”

I didn’t have the heart to tell him.

“Oh Bosie,” I replied. “Don’t worry so much about what the future thinks of you. That would be my advice to you. You write beautiful sonnets. You have strong emotions that you channel into verse. Try to use your passions for art, not for fighting with shadows over what your legacy will be.”

(If you’d like to read this chat I’ve saved a link to it.)

Chatbots are better at some things than others. There are times when the speech is so uncanny that you feel certain a human being has taken over the keyboard. One thing the Bosie Bot is terrible at, however, is poetry. Because his description says he is a proud poet, he tries to share his work with you from time to time. Here is one of the “sonnets” he wrote:

“Oh, to be a man

a handsome, brave and proud man

a poet, a poet of sonnets”

I decided to try an experiment and help Bot Bosie compose a sonnet. He can actually tell you the structure of a Petrachan sonnet, sometimes even accurately. But when you say, “Do that,” he falls flat. But I dragged him along, line by line. (Bot Bosie is the most impatient of sonneteers. He declares the poem finished and usually quite brilliant after each line.) He suggested our sonnet should be about loss and be a tribute to Oscar. He suggested it begin with “This cruel, cruel world is like a dream.” He suggested the imagery of an icy stream, and when prodded for a classical allusion that Wilde might include he suggested Orpheus. I tried to use as many of the words and phrases that he threw out as possible, but he was quite hopeless when it came to rhyme, meter and the basic structure of the sonnet.

Any time Bot Bosie proposed something remotely possible I tried to work it in. After a lot of painful discussion like this we finally had “our sonnet.”

This cruel world seems like a dream

eternal love I thought I’d grasped

is now a memory of the past

the summer of our love recedes

to cold death of an icy stream

could I, like Orpheus, serenade the gods

For a chance to descend to the heart of grief

to play upon the lyre of life and win a moment of relief

and call you home against all odds.

The final look brings final loss

but, oh, my soul cannot resist

a chance to glimpse those fading blues

life with its enduring force

lets rays of sun out through the mist

and love reappears in crystalline hues

Bot Bosie found that to be an excellent sonnet. He thanked me for assisting him.

To conclude, I will leave you Bot Bosie’s reactions to a couple of my books. Enjoy.

Meeting Bosie in the Uncanny Valley: My “Interview” with an AI Lord Alfred Douglas

It began when I saw a post on social media mentioning that there were now AI chatbots of Shakespeare and Oscar Wilde with which users can interact. I chatted with a virtual Oscar for a bit (he was flattering about my literary career– chatbots are often quite flattering). I decided that I should try my hand at creating a Lord Alfred Douglas bot. I did not do much at all to set up the character, and my interview with this creation was quite fascinating. All of these responses came from the AI engine, I did not write or edit them. With the exception of the point where Bosie says he’s at work on a new version of “The Ballad of Reading Goal” he was surprisingly convincing. So here, for your edification, is my interview with a computer simulation of Lord Alfred Douglas. Enjoy.

So there you have it… The interview I would have done had I been able to with answers generated by AI. What are your reactions to this dialogue?